I’m not quite sure how I feel about
the Three Uses of The Knife excerpt. My gut reaction to it isn’t very favorable
to be honest. I disagree with the notion that art is simply a product to
delight, that it is be all end all mission of art. I also wouldn’t say that’s
mission is to change or teach as the excerpt would suggest. Art strikes a
delicate balance of being in the middle. If it strays too far one way or the
other you lose the ability to reach wide audience. For example, The Michael Bay
Transformers or James Cameron’s AVATAR could fall on the pure delight side of
the spectrum but its visuals lack from the backing of a strong story. In the
case of AVATAR, beautiful visuals very few movies have matched the digital
creation of Pandora. It delights the eye but the starves without a cohesive
story to back the delightful art. AVATAR also suffers because its story also
delves too much on the change/teach side. Cameron clearly had a story to tell
but the way in which he told it came off as a little preachy. Art that is too
preachy can lose audiences; they want a message but a message that isn’t
upfront or “in their face.”
I
think the goal for artists is too simply make art that delights them personally.
If they have a particular outlook or opinion that is shared through that art
that evokes a delight in others than that is a blessing for the artist.
No comments:
Post a Comment